<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://tech-review.org/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>.net_2.0</title><link>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/default.aspx</link><description>My coding blog entries.   Typically will either be more complex coding examples or overcoming product issues / troubleshooting resolutions.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Unable to Install SP1 for Vista?</title><link>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2008/03/18/unable-to-install-sp1-for-vista.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:12:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8f0d8647-db12-4f5a-9072-3a2bf38eecbe:32051</guid><dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/comments/32051.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/commentrss.aspx?PostID=32051</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=32051</wfw:comment><description>Today, trying to update Vista Ultimate to SP1 (released today), I ran into a bizarre error message: "Service Pack can not be installed. System does not have required supporting Langauge Pack." All of the language packs were installed but there was a exclamation...(&lt;a href="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2008/03/18/unable-to-install-sp1-for-vista.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://tech-review.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=32051" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/tags/Vista+installation+issue/default.aspx">Vista installation issue</category></item><item><title>Unable to use ASPNET_REGIIS -I for installing Asp.Net 2.0 on Vista / Windows 2008</title><link>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2008/03/08/unable-to-use-aspnet-regiis-i-for-installing-asp-net-2-0-on-vista-windows-2008.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8f0d8647-db12-4f5a-9072-3a2bf38eecbe:32031</guid><dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/comments/32031.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/commentrss.aspx?PostID=32031</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=32031</wfw:comment><description>Vista and Windows Server 2008 have radically re-shaped the simplistic handling of IIS functions and features in terms of both interface and ability to capitalize on cmd line options. In the previous blog entry I outlined the issues I had with uninstalling...(&lt;a href="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2008/03/08/unable-to-use-aspnet-regiis-i-for-installing-asp-net-2-0-on-vista-windows-2008.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://tech-review.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=32031" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Can not uninstall Microsoft Device Emulator 3.0 on 64 bit Vista / Server 2008</title><link>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2008/03/08/can-not-uninstall-microsoft-device-emulator-3-0-on-64-bit-vista-server-2008.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 22:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8f0d8647-db12-4f5a-9072-3a2bf38eecbe:32030</guid><dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/comments/32030.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/commentrss.aspx?PostID=32030</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=32030</wfw:comment><description>I recently upgraded from Windows Server 2003 to Windows Server 2008 on my Quad Core server. Note keyword was upgraded. Other than having to grab Vista Drivers for the 3 NVIDIA graphics cards, was relatively painless. Visual Studio 2008 Beta Version was...(&lt;a href="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2008/03/08/can-not-uninstall-microsoft-device-emulator-3-0-on-64-bit-vista-server-2008.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://tech-review.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=32030" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Debugging TIP of the Day</title><link>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/11/26/debugging-tip-of-the-day.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8f0d8647-db12-4f5a-9072-3a2bf38eecbe:12974</guid><dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/comments/12974.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/commentrss.aspx?PostID=12974</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=12974</wfw:comment><description>If you are like me, you probably have a overall project that consists of many solutions. For whatever reasons it doesn't make sense to have the various solutions and projects all included into a single solution. That makes debugging rather difficult -...(&lt;a href="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/11/26/debugging-tip-of-the-day.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://tech-review.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12974" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/tags/Debugging/default.aspx">Debugging</category></item><item><title>.NET 3.5 issues on 64 bit Windows 2003 Server</title><link>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/11/14/net-3-5-issues-on-64-bit-windows-2003-server.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8f0d8647-db12-4f5a-9072-3a2bf38eecbe:11206</guid><dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/comments/11206.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/commentrss.aspx?PostID=11206</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=11206</wfw:comment><description>Recently I decided to forgo using my laptop for developement and instead put together a brand new system that has six monitors and a dual core Intel 64 bit system. Since Vista would not install - I opted to go for Windows Server 2003 instead, as I will...(&lt;a href="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/11/14/net-3-5-issues-on-64-bit-windows-2003-server.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://tech-review.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11206" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>When the Random() Function always returns 0 and not a random number</title><link>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/11/06/when-the-random-function-always-returns-0.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 07:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8f0d8647-db12-4f5a-9072-3a2bf38eecbe:10355</guid><dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/comments/10355.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/commentrss.aspx?PostID=10355</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10355</wfw:comment><description>While working with Greg on the .Net Trade 6 refresh update, we ran into a bizarre behavior. The load balancing is accomplished by using the .Net random method based upon the number of servers in the list. Part of the testing we do, is a ton of fail-over...(&lt;a href="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/11/06/when-the-random-function-always-returns-0.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://tech-review.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10355" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/tags/C_2300_+Bug+Random_28002900_/default.aspx">C# Bug Random()</category></item><item><title>VS 2008 - It does increase productivity...</title><link>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/10/19/vs-2008-it-does-increase-productivity.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8f0d8647-db12-4f5a-9072-3a2bf38eecbe:8483</guid><dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/comments/8483.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8483</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8483</wfw:comment><description>It has been two weeks or so, with using VS 2008 (Beta) exclusively and to date have not used the VS 2005 to do any coding. While I really see no use for LINQ and some of the other newer technologies (mainly because I code for performance and not ease...(&lt;a href="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/10/19/vs-2008-it-does-increase-productivity.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://tech-review.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8483" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>My Biggest Beef with  -Vista:  Uninstall doesn't un-install anything</title><link>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/10/19/my-biggest-beef-with-vista-uninstall-doesn-t-un-install-anything.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8f0d8647-db12-4f5a-9072-3a2bf38eecbe:8482</guid><dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/comments/8482.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8482</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8482</wfw:comment><description>If there is one thing about advertising I despise - is when any manufacturer advertises better reliability from other versions to justify the upgrade. The opening tone is serious because this is a serious issue, because unlike subscribing to take the...(&lt;a href="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/10/19/my-biggest-beef-with-vista-uninstall-doesn-t-un-install-anything.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://tech-review.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8482" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Orcas - Are you getting the most out of it...(Conversion Process)</title><link>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/10/09/orcas-are-you-getting-the-most-out-of-it.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:05:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8f0d8647-db12-4f5a-9072-3a2bf38eecbe:7831</guid><dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/comments/7831.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/commentrss.aspx?PostID=7831</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7831</wfw:comment><description>Since my exposure of playing with Ajax during all the Beta cycles, and ending up so frustrated - I kinda stepped back and stopped participating in anything related to a Beta. So, it may be a surprise that I actually installed Orcas (Beta of VS 2008) and...(&lt;a href="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/10/09/orcas-are-you-getting-the-most-out-of-it.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://tech-review.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7831" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Images and working with a DAL</title><link>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/08/21/images-and-working-with-a-dal.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8f0d8647-db12-4f5a-9072-3a2bf38eecbe:5014</guid><dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/comments/5014.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5014</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5014</wfw:comment><description>Most examples of working with saving images to a SQL Server database within a application that does not implement a DAL, usually work off only a HTTPPosted file and looks kinda like this: //create a stream Stream imgStream = proposedFile.InputStream;...(&lt;a href="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/08/21/images-and-working-with-a-dal.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://tech-review.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5014" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Latest Benchmark Source Code Released: .Net StockTrader</title><link>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/07/30/latest-benchmark-source-code-released-net-stocktrader.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 04:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8f0d8647-db12-4f5a-9072-3a2bf38eecbe:3815</guid><dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/comments/3815.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3815</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3815</wfw:comment><description>I am happy to report that the .Net StockTrader Benchmark Application (and subsequent source code) are now released. Visit: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/netframework/bb499684.aspx Also, this is one of the first times that a benchmark application has...(&lt;a href="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/07/30/latest-benchmark-source-code-released-net-stocktrader.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://tech-review.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3815" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>The IDataReader - Frustration in DAL land and other frustrations</title><link>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/07/23/the-idatareader-frustration-in-dal-land.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8f0d8647-db12-4f5a-9072-3a2bf38eecbe:3468</guid><dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/comments/3468.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3468</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3468</wfw:comment><description>The problem with programming sometimes is learning the annoyances that plague a development language. I was troubleshooting my SQL DAL, which instead of using the "it COULD work with every data provider" (the caveat being - if the only data relationships...(&lt;a href="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/07/23/the-idatareader-frustration-in-dal-land.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://tech-review.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3468" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>System.Security.SecurityException: The source was not found, but some or all event logs could not be searched.  Inaccessible logs:</title><link>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/07/19/system-security-securityexception-the-source-was-not-found-but-some-or-all-event-logs-could-not-be-searched-inaccessible-logs.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 01:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8f0d8647-db12-4f5a-9072-3a2bf38eecbe:3289</guid><dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/comments/3289.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3289</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3289</wfw:comment><description>Adding Event logging works the same with VISTA as it does in XP. Unfortunately there is no programmic method to make it work the first time. The symptoms are you check and check the event logs to see where your entries are but alas nothing. Under VISTA...(&lt;a href="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/07/19/system-security-securityexception-the-source-was-not-found-but-some-or-all-event-logs-could-not-be-searched-inaccessible-logs.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://tech-review.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3289" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/tags/c_2300_/default.aspx">c#</category><category domain="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/tags/Asynch/default.aspx">Asynch</category></item><item><title>The SqlParameter is already contained by another SqlParameterCollection</title><link>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/07/18/the-sqlparameter-is-already-contained-by-another-sqlparametercollection.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 03:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8f0d8647-db12-4f5a-9072-3a2bf38eecbe:3250</guid><dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/comments/3250.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3250</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3250</wfw:comment><description>A few days ago, I closed the laptop lid on my Toshiba and went to where I was going. It never came out of standby and as a result - had to cold power it. Unfortunately for me, I had Visual Studio open, and when I re-opened my solution - only 36 of the...(&lt;a href="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/07/18/the-sqlparameter-is-already-contained-by-another-sqlparametercollection.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://tech-review.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3250" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/tags/SQL+c_2300_/default.aspx">SQL c#</category></item><item><title>Sample Applications you should learn from.. c# / VS Studio 2005</title><link>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/07/17/sample-applications-you-should-learn-from-c-vs-studio-2005.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 04:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8f0d8647-db12-4f5a-9072-3a2bf38eecbe:3196</guid><dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/comments/3196.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3196</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3196</wfw:comment><description>In the world of adopting .Net as a programming language of choice, the ultimate question is, "Where are the samples I can learn from". If you are reading this, you learned your basics maybe on your own or from some programing class, but you probably actually...(&lt;a href="http://tech-review.org/blogs/.net_2.0/archive/2007/07/17/sample-applications-you-should-learn-from-c-vs-studio-2005.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://tech-review.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3196" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>